《暗黑破坏神：不朽》机械戒指图纸揭秘

一小段：一、机械戒指的设计原理

《暗黑破坏神：不朽》中的机械戒指，结合了机械结构与奇幻元素，为玩家呈现出独特的装备设计。这些机械戒指不仅具备美观的外表，还在实战中提供了强大的战斗力。其核心原理是利用各种精密的机械设备和复杂的数据算法，使战斗效果得到极大的提升。

一大步：二、制作材料与工艺

《暗黑破坏神：不朽》机械戒指图纸的制作，需要大量高品质的材料。比如，主件由金属、矿石和魔能芯片合金构成，装饰部分则使用了罕见的珍稀宝石作为点缀。在制作过程中，巧妙运用雕刻、锻造、电子合成等多种技术融合，让这枚戒指在短时间内达到极致的战斗效果。

一小段：三、属性加成与搭配

机械戒指针对6种职业设计的独特加成为游戏增添了不少玩法。以下将简述各职业所对应的机械戒指特点：

1. 野蛮人：提升近战伤害和物理防护装备抗性。

2. 武行者：增强连击效果，提高破绽判定准确性。

3. 圣教军：提高治疗量和复活速度，使团队收益更大。

4. 猎魔人：增加远程攻击范围及暴击率，更适合远程射击。

5. 法师：加快施法速度和能量填充速率，增强爆发力。

6. 死灵法师：显著提升召唤生物效能，提升元素伤害抵抗。

一大步：四、《暗黑破坏神：不朽》机械戒指图纸的价值

这枚机械戒指图纸，不仅是游戏中的核心道具，《暗黑破坏神：不朽》的珍贵宝物，还是玩家们对游戏世界热爱的象征。通过这张机械戒指图纸的研究和打造，为游戏带来了更多可玩的精彩内容。然而，只有掌握足够技能和资源，才能炼成这样的神器！对于希望提高自己装备水平和战斗力的玩家而言，《暗黑破坏神：不朽》机械戒指图纸具有极高的收藏价值与实用价值。

一小段：《dark souls: eternal》Mech ring blueprint

“《 dark soul: eternal 》,” said the CEO, with a distant look.

undefined

“A blue-print,” the assistant replied. She checked a list again and smiled, “yes,” pointing to the right column, next to the name.

I remember my days as a tester for Blizz.

There was excitement in just entering the virtual world — seeing old players as NPC characters again was great.

undefined

The assistant continued typing on a phone while I was imagining playing in those lands now again after so many times lost, “But 1v1 isn't that popular anymore,” she added. “People just farm and repeat the runs every so often,” I thought. I was playing too many mobile MMORPGS that focus on repeat plays as farming methods, with very generic content — maybe Blizz can offer something better?

I had no chance — that game still stands above any other. But hey - the blue-print isn't worth very much since farming isn't really needed to finish those areas.

Or it could serve a purpose that even in the most generic games has been forgotten.

undefined

Sure, they had to make an easier path for lowbie farmers but the harder ones are good.

For a company that's only tried to milk a product again and again – yes again, you can tell what I'm thinking by Blizz’s marketing of Warcraft Classic – and then again by not changing a word on all patches even if I was correct and someone pointed me out by using 50 lines with all the numbers at patch 13.50 , still had a bug - yes 30 plus since I tested the game, in a patch – yes with numbers but no fix.

I remember playing Warcraft for five times per week and not getting much done in a short period. Blizz was always pushing to change the landscape which didn't go very well with our playtime limits since we played for hours on end — if there are still any games like that today or those long-running MMORPGs, some sort of restrictions would have hurt that — but hey- it's fun! I like a good farming game (my latest one had very specific grinding quests designed as if you had one day to finish them. It even gave you a special map with the necessary locations so

undefined

all you needed was food and a tank - which was kind too).

But I want change - maybe Blizz will? Oh - my job would be testing games instead of doing actual analysis.

We were testing a lot at work until they decided we needed "quality-assurance."

undefined

Blizz didn't have it in the same sense of course (like people with money talking about 40k or similar – whoops - can’t think why this guy keeps ignoring patches). That's more

in terms of “what do players hate” than just a few hundred things.

They really did get better, though; it was clear that when they needed a patch to work on — for those times where people were

undefined

complain-y — they took every opportunity.

Quality assurance means someone watches you to make sure what you're pushing will actually solve user experience (I thought the patch fixing this would fix both parts at once for example, and it didn’t).

When we found 20 odd errors each week — well 24 was the average - usually on multiple things across a broad array of systems — when your own systems are being reviewed for bugs too then sometimes getting into a

undefined

code audit isnī’t ideal. We'd have so many problems they often were fixed before launch. And you're not the person solving all of them (the person working on the particular code for whatever has to be fixed does the heavy 95 percent at first and you might contribute towards this with another piece

of software or do some testing)

You are usually involved later when something is reported incorrectly but doesn't affect a specific group - like an add error — or after many times where

undefined

they’ve been working on 4 items related to player experience. Maybe 50 odd problems, each week too — I guess you have more than the average.

Quality assurance also seems kind of like people with no code

taking over but I’m not trying right now – yet… It’ll happen if it happens.

undefined

Blizz made more patches faster

- although not as frequent as the patch releases during my days; they did seem to try harder though — in their case,

people had 1 more hour instead of playing before being unable to because the game died – with no error messages,

undefined

with just "it stopped working".

Some games seemed worse on patches – Blizz has done pretty well I

think especially. There could be problems because not just what you're working on might affect parts outside of

undefined

them — people often don't even know those things exist. Sometimes, something as silly in a line of code can crash an engine though.

I havenīt written code much - mostly analysis. I thought this was just to go through the games and get to play them but you test quite

a bit as well as do what seems almost equivalent to QA.

undefined

Analysis tends to be better if someone has played the game more — that usually happens in MMORPGs since there's not much that doesnīt change a lot.

The only problem with analysis is it means taking your job pretty soon - you might get

another chance after Blizz's team works on them for two patch cycles. Otherwise,

undefined

they'll send them to developers or other interested parties so those people know what we were facing (if that’s not happening).

It seems a little like 70% code-20% actual gameplay; some companies will just let us do more though

— one with my last role had 50/50.

undefined

One problem I remember is sometimes you can't change

too quickly until the testing changes happen and there're people 10 miles away from where everything else sits who know a bit about systems - and if two of 'em think something needs changing when it actually won‘īt—no luck on those occasions unless all 3 sit together

before they send their requests.

undefined

For a company that just lets QA (and not just in games)

handle what feels like development, QA seems crucial - especially quality assurance. They get everything else too

(specifically code related) after people do their actual tasks.

undefined

It seemed better than anything else I was doing while I had that role — you see some code often enough

In fact - that job didn't

start out with them but since we just needed someone who felt like a QA person we went in there from outside the company

undefined

which let me know what people feel about Blizz's QA division. Now, they've taken it completely external after we left – now

they all seem quite friendly here and really work well.

At some companies that would've taken too forever or maybe had to deal with people feeling unprepared after 6

undefined

months of working on one little thing at a certain rate (for what it seemed like)

It makes more sense to focus on the quality, especially where you’ve developed most all by code yourself – so a large and potentially influential division becomes separate yet still works pretty closely within a structure that can change quickly because many things in these situations might affect many

areas but if we don't get feedback then no one will know.

undefined

The work I'm working on lately isn‘t exactly fun either – and Blizz makes it really seem like that

in reality when you actually do something there's

more joy from the job compared to when I played it for example - but maybe playing would be good.

undefined

Blizz didn’t treat us badly even with their patching process. One problem was I worked mostly outside of normal company hours, meaning if your phone had anything in the morning or evening then

nothing but 30 more bugs could wait until after midnight and it’s nice but a different situation – you could easily deal

with getting those back at some times instead.

undefined

It can also be important to note that they didn‘īt have this big patching system though; just do your usual changes over many updates — the

update from version four (I think 12 patches) was the biggest since my start there 13 or eight before but that had lots

of issues due simply because not everyone is capable enough of updating for several weeks at a length.

undefined

The game was popular on Android first in China. I remember it being like an absolute mess but

even more

complicated is a Chinese version where all the stuff seems like just right. A version

undefined

which was outed after four updates with about twelve

features which didn' t necessarily

all go through those same testing procedures even then - that's a good sign for stability for many applications

undefined

in Asia. Not everything needs or gets local languages – or

additional features; some may end by being the most stable in your markets without any translation - there just isnīt

much more than English anywhere.

undefined

I remember one place being called “The Chinese Division” but it seems like everyone was 10 miles

away so not only

was working well. They even had a division that specifically checked every update — and after about six

undefined

updates (and with about ten in between the initial ones ) — some minor problems are handled and sometimes

they work their way upwards through different managers

if needed but they keep an eye on what new issues seem biggest - the ones people will react to - to fix

undefined

So there's still pretty

good communication when problems crop up. That can also mean you have two sets of QA testers working on Chinese

And I believe it may be 10 different regions by then since many other servers are in

undefined

Asia which leads back onto our current situation at hand.

It’s more flexible working with that division than elsewhere within this kind - there's just something about being far away

That allows the structure to flow

undefined

in an informal way that suits what I want to have done. You would usually only get involved later after someone else has worked on fixing a major section and got those into live; however if you donīt get the change as quick as necessary or they want

a new solution

- especially given my background then sometimes a request is not an upgrade (which doesn‘īt make me less efficient), though

undefined

the job was fun but one reason

for switching to this job last

month is getting rid of the idea of being far away even though I could be very happy staying with my other role - yet in Blizz you'd have to take on

undefined

This felt more suitable for someone from a developer, testing group,

and so it does suit that kind of

person - they’ll definitely get their hands dirty sometimes. And if anything was actually fixed before

undefined

it affects users there should be a better outcome than

if something slipped through.

With regard to how much time I would spend dealing with each thing - sometimes just two hours (usually 20 for what it seems like is a big issue though) or it is several days/weeks. You'd think those big problems would take forever but that means they have a high

undefined

importance if

something falls through and you find a massive issue where they do need those fixes now

with little work involved

undefined

other companies make it 30% 50%, sometimes higher though.

Another problem with having bugs

sometimes can get you labeled at the end of this period is

undefined

- you want so much but the time actually available usually isn’t that significant, and since there's an incentive or pressure to find a

large amount (for many teams across an organization including themselves).

Another aspect would involve making an efficient path with everyone involved on 1000 plus issues. We're talking a

undefined

thousand not just those which have been

dealt with but also reported as yet.

It seems kind of obvious - getting rid of all problems is nearly useless or you could almost call people lazy

undefined

without being unkind (or simply call us

definitely worse). Maybe they should get into fixing everything and doing that at the end – then the job would definitely

Not every feature needed fixing right away — though, in testing there'd likely end up with fixing several things

undefined

before final release. I mean you need to ensure proper functionality even if

people do make the update - the problem is just they get

those much more slowly and the fixes would happen after.

undefined

They usually did pretty well at getting things working properly because developers worked together; often that means working with several external studios now though.

One challenge could be that

they tend to come and go frequently (if their projects are similar) so even if you don‘īt fully

undefined

get involved, it seems possible there will end up

working on other systems - which doesní

always make sure anything goes out properly. Sometimes they

undefined

even seemed

It felt like when it came down to developers working individually rather than the internal teams it wasnțт